British Battlecruiser class Lion and Princess Royal in action at the Battle of the Dogger Bank.
History, development, service, specifications and pictures.
Embodying all the strengths and weaknesses of Fisher’s battlecruiser concept, Lion was every inch a thoroughbred. Fast and powerful, but vulnerable to fire from heavy vessels, the sight of Lion at the head of Beatty’s battlecruiser fleet was a stirring sight which disguised the basic frailty of high speed, lightly armored vessels.
The magnificent HMS Lon was the warhorse of David Beatty, the impetuously courageous genius commanding the Grand Fleet’s Battle-Cruiser Squadron. Like all of her kind she carried a punch that could crack a battleship, yet was perilously vulnerable to any plunging return fire. The deficiencies of such battlecruisers were recognized and accepted as the type could not be used effectively by the cautious, and caution was one word that Beatty never learned.
In January 1915 signal traffic warned of a new German operation: Hipper, with a light screen, but backed by the might of the German High Seas Fleet, was bound for the Dogger Bank area with a vague brief to deal with any British light forces that may have been out.
Beatty sailed with five battle-cruisers and Goodenough’s 1st Light Cruiser Squadron, rendezvousing with Tyrwhitt’s Harwich Force in the gray dawn south-east of the bank. Virtually at that instant, the latter ran into Hipper’s screen and, as day broke, the Lion led the British line in a tail chase of the already fleeing enemy, whose force was slowed somewhat by the hybrid cruiser/battle-cruiser Blücher.
By full daylight, in clear conditions, the Lion had closed to within 18,300 meters (20,000 yards) of the Blücher (at the rear of Hipper’s line) and opened fire with her forward 343-mm (13.5-inch) guns. As the range dropped to 16,000 m (17,500 yards), Beatty signalled each ship to engage its opposite number but, as Hipper had only four ships, this was ambiguous and resulted in SMS Derfflinger, ahead of the Blücher, not being engaged at all. Undisturbed, she made good practice, and undoubtedly contributed to the severe punishment soon sustained by the Lion. Her fuel contaminated by holed tanks and power generators failing, the Lion slowed, signalling the remainder to close the enemy. This was followed by an order to turn eight points to avoid a totally nonexistent submarine. Beatty, losing touch as the battle moved away, signalled ‘Course NE’, followed too quickly by ‘Engage the enemy’s rear’. The two signals were read in conjunction, and taken to mean that the force should engage the hapless Blücher which, shattered and ablaze, was falling well behind the remainder. With no power for signal projectors and at a range where flags could no longer be interpreted, Beatty lost control of the battle. In vain did he shift his flag, for Hipper’s three survivors were beyond reach and the Blücher fought to the very end.
Though the enemy had lost a useful ship and SMS Seydlitz had narrowly missed blowing up, an annihilating victory had been lost through poor gunnery, poor initiative and poor signalling. As a fuming Fisher wrote, ‘What excuse have we to offer?’
The Lion, hit by an estimated 16 heavy shells, languished under repair for four months.
On return to service, she was flagship of Beatty’s reorganized Battle-Cruiser Fleet of three homogeneous squadrons. A quiet year followed, enlivened only by a couple of seaplane raids on the enemy coast and yet another failure to apprehend a hit-and-run attack on Lowestoft and Yarmouth in April 1916.
Only five weeks later came Jutland.
The battle is covered elsewhere but, during the initial ‘run to the south’, a shell from SMS Lützow removed the better part of the roof of ‘Q’ turret, the resultant explosion and fire in which would have destroyed the ship except for the courageous action of a mortally wounded Royal Marine officer who promptly flooded the magazine, earning a Victoria Cross. Within 30 minutes Beatty was to see two more of his ships blow up from the same cause, prompting the famous remark to his flag captain that ‘there seems to be something wrong with our bloody ships today’.
The Lion and her consorts sighted Admiral Scheer’s High Seas Fleet, closed it, reported and then drew it to the north onto Jellicoe’s guns, finally forcing round the head of the German line to gain time. After the indecisive battle fleet encounter, in the failing light of late dusk, a frustrated Beatty was still in contact with Hipper, unable to goad Jellicoe into further major contact before darkness.
The anti-climax of the end of the battle of Jutland was painful for Beatty after his all-out efforts. The Lion had sustained 12 heavy hits, HMS Tiger 10 and HMS Princess Royal six and, on the passage back to Rosyth, the flagship committed 99 dead to the deep. She reported ready for action within two days and was fully repaired within seven weeks.
Beatty’s association with the ship ended early in 1917 on his appointment as Commander-in-Chief of the Grand Fleet. The Lion took the flag of Vice Admiral Pakenham but, although at sea as much as ever, was not again to see action.
A victim of the Washington Treaty conditions, she was scrapped at Jarrow in 1924.
More pictures of battlecruiser Lion
Specifications Battlecruisers Lion and Princess Royal
|Battlecruisers Lion class||Specification (as built)|
|Displacement||26,350 tons standard and 29,700 tons full load|
|Dimensions length||675 ft (over all 700 ft)|
|Dimensions beam||88.5 ft|
|Dimensions draught||27 2/3 ft (maximum 31 2/3 ft)|
|Propulsion||Parson turbine, 4 screws, 42 Yarrow boilers, 70,000 shp|
|Main armament||8 x 13.5-inch M.V. guns|
|Secondary armament||14 x 4-inch guns|
|Anti-aircraft||2 x 3-inch AA guns|
|Torpedo tubes||2 x 21-inch torpedo tubes, submerged on broadside|
|Armour lower belt||5-9 inch|
|Armour upper belt||4-6 inch|
|Armour bulkheads||4 inch|
|Armour barbettes||8-9 inch|
|Armor gunhouses||9 inch|
|Armor command tower||10 inch|
|Armor upper deck||1 inch|
|Armor lower deck amidships||1-1.5 inch|
|Armor lower deck ends||2.5 inch|
|Complement||1,085 (Lion); 1,061 (Princess Royal)|
|Launched||August 1910 (Lion); April 1911 (Princess Royal)|
2 thoughts on “Battlecruiser Lion”
I believe you will find the beam was 90′, not 80′. (Typo?)
Thanks, in my source it’s 27 Meters, which is c.88.58 ft. So I fixed it to this value. In the original Jane’s Fughting Ships its 8 1/2 feet.